[LBo] Processor speed
Allen Farley
drax946 at gmail.com
Mon Oct 1 18:04:45 CEST 2007
Troy wrote:
> I have a HP Pavilion ze4125 lap top, and I just filled the memory to
> capacity (1 gig), but the computer still seems to run slow. According to
> HP's web site, the processor is an AMD Athlon Xp 1600+, which runs at
> 1.4GHz. However, when I run the cat command on the /proc/cpuinfo
> file, I
> receive the following output:
>
> troy at troy-laptop:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
> cpu family : 6
> model : 8
> model name : mobile AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1600+
> stepping : 0
> cpu MHz : 662.575
> cache size : 256 KB
> fdiv_bug : no
> hlt_bug : no
> f00f_bug : no
> coma_bug : no
> fpu : yes
> fpu_exception : yes
> cpuid level : 1
> wp : yes
> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov
> pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mp mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow up ts fid vid
> bogomips : 1325.90
> clflush size : 32
>
> If I'm reading this right, the cpu speed is 662 MHz, not the 1.4 GHz it
> should be. I'm running Ubuntu 7.04. Any thoughts or ideas?
>
I do know that laptops can vary their CPU frequency to conserve battery
power, this may be what you are seeing. Here's some snippets from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athlon
Mobile Athlon XPs (/Athlon XP-M/) are identical to normal Athlon XPs,
apart from running at lower voltages, often lower bus speeds, and not
being multiplier <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPU_multiplier>-locked.
The lower V-core rating caused the CPU to have lower power consumption
(ideal for battery-powered laptops) and lower heat production. Athlon
XP-M CPUs also have a higher-rated heat tolerance, a requirement of the
tight conditions within a notebook PC.
The Athlon XP-M replaced the older Mobile Athlon 4. The Mobile Athlon 4
used the older /Palomino/ core, while the Athlon XP-M used the newer
/Thoroughbred/ and /Barton/ cores. Some specialized low-power Athlon
XP-Ms utilize the microPGA socket 563
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socket_563> rather than the standard
Socket A.
[***Notice this part***]
The CPUs, like their mobile K6+
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_K6-III> predecessors, were also
capable of dynamic clock adjustment for power optimization. When the
system is idle <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idle>, the CPU clocks
itself down through a lower bus multiplier and also reduces its voltage.
Then, when a program demands more computational resources, the CPU very
quickly (there is some latency) returns to intermediate or maximum speed
to meet the demand. This technology was marketed as "PowerNow!
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerNow%21>". It was similar to Intel's
SpeedStep <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpeedStep> power saving
technique. The feature was controlled by the CPU, motherboard BIOS
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BIOS>, and operating system
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operating_system>. AMD later renamed the
technology to Cool'n'Quiet
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cool%27n%27Quiet>, on their K8-based CPUs
(Athlon 64 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athlon_64>, etc), and
re-imagined it for use on desktop PCs as well.
--
Allen Farley
drax946[at]gmail.com
Linux User #437334
More information about the QnA
mailing list